Why the US Is Obsessed With Buying a Giant Ice Island (And What It Means for Your Money)

The best HR advice comes from people who’ve been in the trenches.

That’s what this newsletter delivers.

I Hate it Here is your insider’s guide to surviving and thriving in HR, from someone who’s been there. It’s not about theory or buzzwords — it’s about practical, real-world advice for navigating everything from tricky managers to messy policies.

Every newsletter is written by Hebba Youssef — a Chief People Officer who’s seen it all and is here to share what actually works (and what doesn’t). We’re talking real talk, real strategies, and real support — all with a side of humor to keep you sane.

Because HR shouldn’t feel like a thankless job. And you shouldn’t feel alone in it.

Sign Up Free

Hey everyone,

I need to talk about something that sounds like a joke but absolutely isn't.

The United States wants to buy Greenland.

Yes, Greenland. The massive frozen island between Canada and Europe that most of us only think about when we're looking at a world map and wondering why it looks so huge.

Since Trump came back to office, this idea has gone from "weird tweet" to actual foreign policy. And after watching the US move on Venezuela, I'm starting to think nothing is off the table anymore.

But here's what caught my attention: this isn't really about ice and polar bears. It's about $4 trillion worth of resources sitting under the frost. And a complete reshaping of global trade routes.

Let me break down why this matters.

Greenland has been owned by Denmark for centuries. For most of that time, nobody cared. It was frozen, remote, and basically useless for anything except military radar stations.

That's changing fast.

Oil reserves: Back in 2008, researchers estimated Greenland could be sitting on over 52 billion barrels of oil. To put that in perspective, that would double the entire oil reserves of the United States. Just like that.

Rare earth minerals: These are the metals you need for everything from smartphones to electric vehicles to fighter jets. China currently dominates the rare earth market, which is a massive strategic vulnerability for the US. Greenland could change that equation entirely.

Arctic resources overall: Analysts estimate that 13% of the world's undiscovered oil and 30% of its natural gas are located in the Arctic region. As temperatures rise and ice melts, these resources are becoming accessible for the first time in human history.

We're talking about a frozen treasure chest that's slowly unlocking itself.

Here's the part that blew my mind.

As Arctic ice melts, new shipping lanes are opening up. The Northwest Passage—a route through the Arctic connecting the Atlantic and Pacific oceans—is becoming navigable for longer periods each year.

Why does this matter?

Right now, if you want to ship goods from Asia to Europe, you either go through the Suez Canal (long, congested, and occasionally blocked by stuck container ships) or around Africa (even longer). The Panama Canal works for some routes but has size limitations.

The Arctic routes are dramatically shorter. We're talking about shaving weeks off shipping times and billions off global logistics costs.

Whoever controls access to these routes has leverage over global trade. That's not a small thing.

This isn't the first time America has wanted Greenland.

During World War II, when Nazi Germany invaded Denmark, the US essentially took over protection of Greenland. After the war ended, President Truman offered Denmark $100 million in gold—about $1.6 billion in today's money—to buy the island outright.

Denmark said no.

Instead, the US got permission to build military bases, including Thule Air Base. During the Cold War, this base was critical because it's only about 3,000 miles from Moscow. If nuclear missiles were going to fly, Greenland was in the middle of everything.

That military presence never left. The US already has boots on the ground in Greenland. The question is whether they want more than just a lease.

The US isn't the only country eyeing the Arctic.

Russia has been militarizing its northern coastline aggressively. They literally planted a flag on the seabed under the North Pole to stake their claim. That's not subtle.

China has invested billions into Greenland's infrastructure and what they call the "Arctic Silk Road"—basically positioning themselves to dominate Arctic trade routes the same way they've dominated manufacturing.

The US response? They reopened their consulate in Nuuk (Greenland's capital) in 2020 and committed $4 billion to upgrade air base infrastructure. The Arctic is becoming a new front in great power competition, and Greenland is ground zero.

Here's where it gets complicated.

Denmark keeps saying Greenland isn't for sale. They just invested $1.5 billion into the island's defense, which is a pretty clear signal. And Greenland is part of a NATO ally—invading it would theoretically be a massive red line.

But here's the twist: in 2009, Greenland was granted the legal right to become fully independent from Denmark.

The population is tiny—about 56,000 people. If they voted for independence and then chose to align with the United States voluntarily, that's a very different story than military conquest.

Some analysts have tried to put a price tag on the island: around $2 trillion. That sounds insane until you remember what's underneath the ice.

The path forward probably isn't tanks and invasions. It's economic incentives, infrastructure investment, and waiting for the ice to keep melting.

So what does this mean for your portfolio?

Energy plays: If Greenland's oil reserves become accessible, we're talking about a massive new supply source. The companies positioned to drill in Arctic conditions—and the technology providers who make that possible—could benefit enormously. This is a long-term thesis, not a trade.

Rare earth miners: Any reduction in China's dominance over rare earth minerals is bullish for Western mining companies and the entire EV/clean energy supply chain. Watch for news about Greenland mining permits.

Defense contractors: Increased Arctic military presence means more spending on cold-weather equipment, surveillance systems, and base infrastructure. The $4 billion commitment is just the start.

Shipping and logistics: If Arctic routes become viable year-round, it reshapes global trade. Companies positioned to operate in these conditions—or ports that become new hubs—could see huge tailwinds.

Here's how I think about it.

Greenland is like a shuttered treasure chest that everyone ignored because it was frozen shut. Now that climate change is melting the lock, every major power suddenly realizes what's inside: the shortest trade routes on the planet, enough oil to reshape energy markets, and the rare earth minerals that power modern technology.

The US is trying to buy the chest before Russia and China pick the lock themselves.

Whether this happens through purchase, partnership, or Greenland's own independence movement, the strategic importance of the Arctic is only going up. And as investors, we should be paying attention to a region that most people still think of as empty ice.

The frozen wasteland is thawing. And trillions of dollars are thawing with it.

See you tomorrow.

— Alex

Not financial advice. Just what I'm learning and thinking about.